SciArt: prácticas transdisciplinares en la sinergia del Arte y la Ciencia

Rocío García Robles; Amalia Ortega Rodas

doi:10.25145/j.bartes.2023.17.03

Rocío García Robles Universidad de Sevilla https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6082-084X
Amalia Ortega Rodas Universidad de Sevilla https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-9466

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25145/j.bartes.2023.17.03

Keywords: SciArt, art, science, technology, aesthetics

Abstract

A possible definition of the term SciArt would include its characterization as a post-disciplinary and post-media practice, merging elements typically associated with Arts and Sciences, generating research in both areas, while not forgetting technology as a facilitator and product of the scientific field in which it is grounded. In this context, and from our research (ASTER project, FEDER funds https://aster.us.es)), we aim to provide some evidence regarding the historical and institutional context of SciArt practices, as well as the characterization of these practices in their multiple dimensions. We attempt to address certain questions: What are the precedents in SciArt production? How do the involved agents typically develop this type of work? What defines a SciArt piece?

References

Aguirre A. y Wilcox, B. (2008). EcoHealth: Envisioning and Creating a Truly Global Transdiscipline in EcoHealth 5(3) 238-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-008-0197-6.

Ascott, Roy. «Art, technology, consciousness: mind@large», Leonardo (2000), 204.

Ascott, Roy. «Planetary Technoetics: Art, Technology and Consciousness», Leonardo, 37 (2004), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024094041139265.

Ascott, Roy. Centre for the Advanced Inquiry in the Interactive Arts., & International CAiiA Research Conference, University of Wales (1998).

Ascott, Roy. «Reframing consciousness», Intellect Books (1999), 314.

Dewey-Hagborg, D. http://deweyhagborg.com/projects/stranger-visions (2022).

Eisner, Eliot. The Enlightened Eye. Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice. New York, MacMillan Publising Company (1990) ,3.

Forbes, Angus Graeme. «Articulating Media Arts Activities in Art-Science Contexts», Leonardo, 48(4) (2015), 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01086.

Glinkowski Paul y Bamford, Anne. Insight and Exchange: An evaluation of the Wellcome Trust’s Sciart programme, London: Wellcome Trust (2009).

Hediger, Irène. «Think Ar-Act Science: Meeting on an Equal Level», en Scott J. (eds), Artists-in-Labs Networking in the Margins, Springer, Vienna. (2010) 84-90 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0321-0_8.

Hoch, Michael, Alexopoulos, Angelos, Preece, Stephen, Storr, M. y Petrilli, Achille. «Art@CMS sciart workshops», en Proceedings of Science (vol. Part F128556). Proceedings of Science (PoS) (2016).

Kupfer, Ariel. «Exploring Art+Science Projects». Leonardo, 49(3) (2016), 272–273.

Madsen, Lynnette, Rosenzweig, Zeev, Cook, Kelsey, Scott, Amy y Jacobson, Amy. «Science at the interface with art», en Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 1319 (2011), pp. 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2011.732.

Marchán-Fiz, Simon. Del Arte Objetual al Arte del Concepto: Epílogo sobre la sensibilidad postmoderna, Ediciones Akal, Madrid (2001).

Miodownik, Mark. «The blossoming of sciart. Materials Today», Elsevier (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00214-1.

Nicolescu, B. (1996) La transdisciplinarité manifeste. Monaco: Rocher. (English translation: 2002, Manifesto of transdisciplinarity, New York: SUNY Press).

Nicolescu, Basarab. «Methodology of Transdisciplinarity», World Futures, 70: 3-4 (2014), 186-199, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934631.

Nowlin, Stephen. «@Caltech: Art, Science and Technology», 1969-1971. Leonardo, 50(5) (2017), 443-447. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01220.

Prophet, Jane. «The artist in the laboratory: co-operating (T)reasonably». Artnodes, 11(11) (2011), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i11.1218.

Puig, Jordi y Carusi, Annamaria; Cassinelli, Alvaro, Pinel, Philipp; Hoel, Aud Sissel. «A-me and braincloud: Art-science interrogations of localization in neuroscience». Leonardo, 51(2) (2018), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01382.

Scott, Jill. Artists-in-Labs Processes of Inquiry, Springer Vienna (2006), 4.

Scott, Jill. «Introduction: Networking is Both an Art and a Science!», en J. Scott (ed.), Artists-in-Labs Networking in the Margins Springer Vienna (2010) 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0321-0_1.

Sleigh Charlotte y Craske, Sarah. «Art and science in the UK: a brief history and critical reflection, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews», 42:4 (2017), 313-330.

Wienroth, Matthias y Goldschmidt, Pippa. «Facilitating Creative Equality in Art-Science: A Methodological Experiment». Leonardo, 50(1) (2017), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01058.

Wilson, Amanda. «Multistable Perception of Art-Science Imagery». Leonardo, 45(2) (2012), 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00282.

Wilson, Brett, Hawkins, Barbara y Sim, Stuart. «Art, Science and Communities of Practice». Leonardo, 48(2) (2015), 152-157. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00972.