Analysis of Coherence Relations in a Fragment by Cicero

Authors

  • Humberte Mederos Martín Universidad de La Laguna
  • Miriam Díaz Gómez Universidad de La Laguna

Keywords:

Rhetorical Structure Theory, coherence relations, Cicero, Laelius de amicitia

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the problems and methods in the analysis of coherence relations, mainly as they are understood in Rhetorical Structure Theory. Then, a fragment by Cicero’s Laelius De Amicitia is analyzed in order to discover the web of relations of coherence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASHER, Nicholas & Alex LASCARIDES (1998): «Bridging», Journal of Semantics 15: 83-113.

ASHER, Nicholas & Alex LASCARIDES (2003): Logics of Conversation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

BAIN, Alexander (2005 [1877]): English Composition and Rhetoric. A Manual, Elibron Classics.

CORBLIN, Francis (1995): Les forms de reprise dans le discours. Anaphores et chaînes de reférénce, Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

DEL TOMA, Eugenio (1999): Saber comer para vivir más, Madrid, Alianza.

GEERAERTS, Dirk & Hubert CUYCKENS (eds.) (2007): The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

GRIMES, Joseph E. (1975): The Thread of Discourse, Mouton Publishers, Berlín, Nueva York, Amsterdam.

HALLIDAY, M. A. K., & Ruqaiya HASAN (1976): Cohesion in English, Longman, Londres.

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. & M. I. M. MATTHIESSEN (2013): Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4ª ed., Routledge, Londres y Nueva York.

HOBBS, Jerry R. (1990): Literature and Cognition, CSLI, Stanford.

HUME, David (1952): An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, edited by SELBY-BIGGE, en Great Books of the Western World, vol. 35, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago.

JURAFSKY, Daniel &James H. MARTIN(2003): Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.

KEHLER, Andrew (2002): Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

KROON, Caroline (1995): Discourse Particles in Latin. A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at, J.C. Gieben, Amsterdam.

LONGACRE, Robert E. (1996): The Grammar of Discourse, 2ª ed., Plenum, Nueva York.

LONGACRE, Robert E. & Shin Ja J. HWANG (2012): Holistic Discourse Analysis, 2ª ed., SIL International, Dallas, TX.

MANN, William C. & Sandra THOMPSON (eds.) (1992): Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam.

MANN, William C., Christian M. I. M. MATTHIESSEN & Sandra THOMPSON (1992): «Rhetorical StructureTheory and Text Analysis», enMANN,W.C. et al. (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 39-78.

MARTIN, J. R. (1992): English Text. System and Structure, John Benjamins, Philadelphia/Amsterdam.

SANDERS, Ted (1997): «Semantic and Pragmatic Sources of Coherence: On the Categorization of Coherence Relations in Context», Discourse Processes 24: 119-148.

SANDERS, Ted & Wilpert SPOOREN (2007): «Discourse and Text Structure», en GEERAERTS, Dirk & Hubert CUYCKENS (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford, pp. 916-941.

SIMENON, Georges (1950): L’amie de Madame Maigret, Presses de La Cité.

SMITH, Carlota S. (2003): Modes of Discourse. The Local Structure of Texts, CUP, Cambridge.

WOLF, Florian & Edward GIBSON (2006): Coherence in Natural Language. Data Structures and Applications, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

M. TVLLI CICERONIS De Re Pvblica, De Legibvs, Cato Maior de Senectvte, Laelivs de Amicitia, J. G. F. POWELL, OCT (2006).

Downloads

Published

2014-11-15

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Mederos Martín, Humberte, and Miriam Díaz Gómez. 2014. “Analysis of Coherence Relations in a Fragment by Cicero”. Fortunatae, no. 25 (November): 351-62. https://www.ull.es/revistas/index.php/fortvnatae/article/view/3776.