El universo en los mitos clásicos
Keywords:
Astronomía, AstrologíaAbstract
The present paper will try to forget the differences that divide astronomy and astrology nowadays. We will do it with examples which make reference to the Classical period. This topic will serve us to make a general revision ofthe Universe (mainly of planets) with the explicit aim of proving that astronomy would not bear the importance that has in our days if in other historical eras astrology would not have participated in its conception.
Downloads
References
Allen, R. H. (1963) Star names. Their lore and meaning. Nueva York.
Bouché-Leclercq, A. (1899) L'Astrologie grecque. Paris.
Cassirer, E. (1923-1931) Philosophie der Symboliscben Formen, Berlín.
Cramer, F. H. (1954) Astrology in Roman law andpolitics. Filadelfia.
de Meo, C. (1986) Lingue tecniche del latino.
Dicks, D. R. (1970) Early greek Astronomy to Aristotle. Ithaca.
Gundel, W.-Gundel, H. G., (1966) Astrologumena. Die astrologische Literatur in der Antike und ihre Geschichte. Wiesbaden.
le Boeuffle, A. (1977) Les noms latins d'astres et de constellations. Paris.
Lindsay, J. (1971) Origins of Astrology. Londres.
Salemme, C. (1983) Introduzione agli Astronómica di Manilio. Nápoles.
Stahl, W. H. (1962) Roman Science. Madison.
Taton, R. (1966) La science antique et médiévale (collab. de J. Beaujeu). Paris.
Webb, E. J. (1952) The names ofthe stars. Londres.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as license it under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with acknowledgment of authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
