Prácticas disruptivas en la medicina regenerativa y la terapia celular: De la heteronormatividad de laboratorio a la emergencia de nuevas exclusiones bioeconómicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25145/j.clepsydra.2021.20.02Keywords:
regenerative medicine, cell-based therapy, biological determinism, queer theory, bioeconomyAbstract
Innovations in regenerative medicine and cell therapy have made possible multiple breakings in the laws and paradigms that determined the beginnings of 20th century biology. The destabilisation of categories and heteronormative dichotomies that demarcated this science made possible the irruption of studies that separated genetic research from sex. Even so, the current implementation of these techno-scientific developments produce other types of exclusion mechanisms we will analyse from a bio-economic point of view: from the reinforcement of the conditions of vulnerability of women donors, to the support of therapeutic promises that semiotically disconnect the contexts of uncertainty of these technologies or the implementation of a performative understanding of health in terms of individual consumption.
Downloads
References
Alaimo, Stacy. «Trans-Corporeal Feminisms and the Ethical Space of Nature». Revista Estudios Feministas, 25: 2 (2017), pp. 909-934, https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584.2017v25n2p909.
Alaimo, Stacy y Heckman, Susan (eds.). Material Feminisms. Bloomington y Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2008.
Åsberg, Cecilia, Koobak, Redi y Johnson, Ericka. «Beyond the Humanist Imagination». NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 19: 4 (2011), pp. 218-230.
Barad, Karen. «Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter». Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 28: 3 (Spring 2003), pp. 801-831.https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.
Beauvoir, Simone de. El segundo sexo. Madrid: Cátedra, 1998 [1949].
Bharadwaj, Anandhi. «Stem Cell Intersections: Perspectives and Experiences», en Bh ar adway, Anandhi (ed.), Global Perspectives on Stem Cell Technologies, Cham: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018, pp. 1-24.
Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Cambridge, Oxford y Boston: Polity Press, 2013.
Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of «Sex». Routledge: New York, 1993.
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London and New York: Routledge, 1990.
Cohen, Cynthia B. y Cohen, Peter J. «International Stem Cell Tourism and the Need for Effective Regulation». Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20:1 (2010), pp. 27-49.
Cooper, Melinda E. Life as Surplus. Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2008.
Crensh aw, Kimberle. «Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, FeministTheory an Antiracist Politics». The University of Chicago Legal Forum 140 (1989), pp. 139-167.
Devlin, Winnie. «Biochemical Flowering». Woman of Power, 23 (1994), pp. 56-58.
EU Commission. Life Sciences and Biotechnology–A Strategy for Europe: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2002.
Farias, Lisette. «The (Mis)Shaping of Health. Problematizing Neoliberal Discourses of Individualism and Responsibility», en Hosseini, Hamed, Goodman, James et al. (eds.), The Rout-ledge Handbook of Transformative Global Studies, New York: Routledge, 2020.
Fernández, Natalia. «Desafiando la institución de la maternidad: reapropiaciones subversivas de las nuevas tecnologías reproductivas (TR A)». Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 31:11 (2016), pp. 119-146.
Fox Keller, Evelyn. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
Franklin, Sarah. «The IVF-Stem Cell Interface». International Journal of Surgery, 4: 2 (2006), pp. 86-90.
Franklin, Sarah. «The Cyborg Embryo: Our Path to Transbiology». Theory, Culture & Society, 23: 7-8 (2006), pp. 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069230.
González, Marta y Pérez, Eulalia. «Ciencia, Tecnología y Género». Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación, OEI, 2 (2002). http://www.campus-oei.org/revis-tactsi/numero2/varios2.htm.Gottweis, Herbert, Salter, Brian y Waldby, Catherine. The Global Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Haddad, Christian. «Embodied Values: Post-Pharmaceutical Health and the Accumulation of Surplus Vitality in Regenerative Stem Cell Medicine». Sociologias. 21: 50 (2019), pp. 48-79.
Haldane, John. «Some Alternatives to Sex». The New Biology, 19 (1955), pp. 7-26.
Haraway, Donna. «The Biological Enterprise: Sex, Mind, and Profit from Human Engineering to Sociobiology». Radical History Review, 20 (1979), pp. 206-237.
Haraway, Donna. «A Manifiesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s», en HARAWAY, Donna, The Haraway Reader. Abingdon: Routledge, 2004.
Hartmann, Max. «Verteilung, Bestimmung, und Vererbung des Geschlechtes bei den Protisten und Thallophyten». Handb. d. Verer, II 1929.
Lacadena, Juan Ramón. Citogenética. Madrid: Editorial Complutense, 1996.
Landecker, Hannah. Culturing Life. How Cells Became Technologies. Harward: Harvard University Press, 2007.
Lury, Celia. Prosthetic Culture. Photography, Memory and Identity. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 1998.
Lykke, Nina. «Are Cyborgs Queer? Biological Determinism and Feminist Theory in the Age of New Reproductive Technologies and Reprogenetics», 2000, http://www.women.it/cybe-rarchive/files/lykke.htm.
Mackenzie, Robin. ‘Queering Spinoza’s Somatechnics: Stem Cells, Strategic Sacralisations and Fantasis of Care and Kind’, en Sullivan, Nikki y Murray, Samantha. (eds.), Somatechnics. Queering the Technologisation of Bodies, London and New York: Routledge, 2016, pp. 87-106.
Manning, Kenneth R. The Black Apollo of Science: The Life of Ernest Everett Just. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
Mauss, Marcel. «Une Catégorie De L’Esprit Humain: La Notion De Personne Celle De “Moi”». The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 68 (1938), pp. 263-81. Accessed November 2, 2020. https://doi:10.2307/2844128.
Mead, Margaret. Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. New York: Morrow, 1935.
Moll, Annemarie. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.
Morgan, Thomas. The Theory of the Gene. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1926.
Nanney, David. «The Role of the Cytoplasm in Heredity», en McElroy, William y Glass, Bentley (eds.), The Chemical Basis of Heredity, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1957, pp. 134-166.
OCDE. The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda, Paris, 2009.
Ortner, Sherry B. y Whitehead, Harriet (eds.). Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
Pollack, Robert. Signs of Life: The Language and Meaning of DNA. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1994.
Pontecorvo, Guido. Trends in Genetic Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 1958.
Rosemann, Achim et al. «Global Regulatory Developments for Clinical Stem Cell Research: Diversification and Challenges to Collaborations». Regenerative Medicine, 11 (2016), pp. 647-57.
Sonneborn, Tracy. «Sexuality in Unicellular Organisms», en Calkins, Gary y Summers, Francis (eds.), Protozoa in Biological Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1941, pp. 666-709.
Thomas, Lewis. The Lives of a Cell: Notes of a Biology Watcher. New York: Viking Press, 1974.
Twine, Richard. «Genomic Natures Read Through Posthumanism». The Sociological Review, 58: 1 (2010), pp. 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01917.x.
Waddington, Conrad. Organisers and Genes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1940.
Waldby, Catherine y Cooper, Melinda. «From Reproductive Work to Regenerative Labour: The Female Body and the Stem Cell Industries». Feminist Theory, 11: 1 (2006), pp. 3-22.
Williams, David y Zhang, Xingdong. Definitions of Biomaterials for the Twenty-First Century.
Elsevier, 2019.
Woodward, Kath (ed.). Identity and Difference. London: Sage, 1997.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are the property of their respective authors, who freely grant the journal the right of first publication.
