Relative Clauses in Private Letters Written in Australia from 1788 to 1900:
A Sociolinguistic Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25145/j.refiull.2025.51.06Palabras clave:
Australian English, relative clauses, Late Modern English, prescriptivism, private lettersResumen
This paper explores the distribution of marked and unmarked relativisation strategies in letters written in Australia from 1788 to 1900. The variables that have been considered to determine the selection of such strategies include: nationality, gender, status, period, syntactic function and animacy of the antecedent. According to the results, wh-relatives were more prevalent, although the possibility to use unmarked particles increases throughout the century. Furthermore, status and period are proven to be two variables that influence the choice of some markers and, by contrast, gender and nationality were determined not to have played a role. Finally, syntactic position and animacy of the antecedent also affect the relative marker utilised in a specific slot.
Referencias
AARTS, Bas, LÓPEZ-COUSO, María José and MÉNDEZ-NAYA, Belén (2012). Late Modern English Syntax. In Alexander Bergs and Laurel J. Brinton (Eds.), English Historical Linguistics. An International Handbook. Volume I (pp. 869-887). De Gruyter Mouton.
AMADOR-MORENO, Carolina (2020). ‘Matt and Mrs Connor is with me now. They are only beginning to learn the work of the camp’: Irish Emigrants Writing from Argentina. In Raymond Hickey (Ed.), Keeping in Touch: Familiar Letters across the English-speaking World (pp.161-186). John Benjamins.
AMADOR-MORENO, Carolina and ÁVILA-LEDESMA, Nancy (2020). Migration Experiences and Identity Construction in Nineteenth-Century Irish Emigrant Letters. In Raymond Hickey and Carolina Amador-Moreno (Eds.), Irish Identities: Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 283-302). Mouton de Gruyter.
AMADOR-MORENO, Carolina and MCCAFFERY, Kevin (2024). Emigrant Letters (and other ego-documents) from Ireland. In Raymond Hickey (Ed.). Oxford Handbook of Irish English (pp. 314-336). Oxford University Press,
AUER, Anita, SCHREIER, Daniel and WATTS, Richard J. (2015). (Eds.). Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge University Press.
BACSKAY-ATKARI, Julia (2020). Changes Affecting Relative Clauses in Late Modern English. In Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg (Eds.), Late Modern English: Novel Encounters (Vol. 214) (pp.91-115). John Benjamins.
BALL, Catherine (1996). A Diachronic Study of Relative Markers in Spoken and Written English. Language Variation and Change 8, 227-258.
BEAL, Joan (2004). English in Modern Times. Arnold.
BIBER, Douglas, JOHANSSON, Stig, LEECH, Geoffrey, CONRAD, Susan and FINEGAN, Edward (1999). Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.
BONNESS, Dania Jovanna (2019). ‘[S]eas may divide and oceans roll between but Friends is Friends whatever intervene’. Emigrant Letters in New Zealand. In Raymond Hickey (Ed.), Keeping in Touch: Emigrant Letters across the English-speaking World (pp. 213-238). John Benjamins.
BORRIE, Wilfred David (1994). The European peopling of Australasia: A Demographic History, 1788-1988. Demography Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.
CAMPBELL, George (1776). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Printed for W. Strahan, T. Cadell and W. Creech at Edinburgh.
CLARK, Manning (1963). A History of Australia. Melbourne University Press.
COCHRANE, George (1989). Origins and Development of the Australian Accent. In Peter Collins and David Blair (Eds.), Australian English (pp. 176-186). University of Queensland Press.
COLLINS, Peter (2014). Relative Clauses in Australian English: A Cross-Varietal Diachronic Study. In Lauren Gawne (Ed.), Selected Papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society (2013) (pp. 355-371). University of Melbourne.
COLLINS, Peter, YAO, Xinyue and BORLONGAN, Ariane (2014). Relative Clauses in Philippine English: a Diachronic Perspective. Language and Computers, 78, 125-146.
DAMOUSI, Joy (2010). Colonial Voices: A Cultural History of English in Australia 1840-1940. Cambridge University Press.
DEKEYSER, Xavier (1984). Relativicers [sic] in Early Modern English: a Dynamic Quantitative Study. In Jacek Fisiak (Ed.), Historical Syntax (pp. 61-87). Mouton de Gruyter.
DENISON, David (1998). Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV. 1776-1997 (pp. 92-329). Cambridge University Press.
DOLLINGER, Stefan (2019). ‘I hope you will excuse my brad writing’: shall vs. will in the 1830s Petworth Emigration to Canada Corpus (PECC). In Raymond Hickey (Ed.), Keeping in Touch: Emigrant Letters across the English-speaking World (pp. 55-79). John Benjamins.
DOSSENA, Marina and DEL LUNGO CAMICIOTTI, Gabriella (2012) (Eds.). Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. John Benjamins.
DOSSENA, Marina and TIEKEN-BOON VAN OSTADE, Ingrid (2009). (Eds.), Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence. Methodology and Data. Peter Lang.
ELSPAß, Stephan (2002). Standard German in the Nineteenth-Century? (Counter-) Evidence from the Private Correspondence of “Ordinary People”. In Andrew R. Linn and Nicola McLelland (Eds.), Standardization. Studies from the Germanic Languages (pp. 43-65). John Benjamins
ELSPAß, Stephan (2012). Between Linguistic Creativity and Formulaic Restrictions: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Nineteenth-Century Lower Class Writers’ Private Letters. In Marina Dossena and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (Eds.), Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe (pp. 45-64). John Benjamins
FITZMAURICE, Susan (2004). The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English. A Pragmatic Approach. John Benjamins.
GUT, Ulrike and CORONEL, Lilian (2012). Relatives Worlwide. In Marianne Hundt and Ulrike Gut (Eds.), Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes (pp. 215-241). John Benjamins
GUY, Gregory and BAYLEY, Robert (1995). On the Choice of Relative Pronouns in English. American Speech, 70(2), 148-162.
HAMMARSTRÖM, Göran (1980). Australian English: its origins and status. Buske.
HERRMANN, Tanja (2005). Relative Clauses in English Dialects of the British Isles. In Bernd Kortmann (Eds.), A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects 1: Agreement, Gender, Relative Clauses (pp. 21-124). Mouton de Gruyer.
HICKEY, Raymond (2019). Mining Emigrant Correspondences for Linguistic Insights. In Raymond Hickey (Ed.), Keeping in Touch: Emigrant Letters across the English-speaking World (pp. 11-35). John Benjamins.
HICKEY, Raymond (2020). The Interplay of Internal and External Factors in Varieties of English. In Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg (Eds.), Late Modern English: Novel Encounters. (Vol. 214) (pp. 43-64). John Benjamins.
HIRST, John (1983). Convict Society and its Enemies. Allen and Unwin.
HOFFMAN, Thomas (2005). Variable vs. Categorical Effects Preposition Pied-Piping and Stranding in British English Relative Clauses. Journal of English Linguistics, 33 (3), 257-297.
HUBER, Magnus. (2017). Structural and Sociolinguistic Factors Conditioning the Choice of Relativizers in Late Modern English: A Diachronic Study Based on the Old Bailey Corpus. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 16 (1), 74-119.
JOHANSSON, Christine (2006). Relativisers in 19th-century English. In Merja Kytö, Mats Rydén, and Erik Smitterberg (Eds.), Nineteenth – Century English: Stability and Change. (pp.136-182). Cambridge University Press.
JOHANSSON, Christine and GEISLER, Christer (1998). Pied Piping in Spoken English. Language and Computers, 23, 67-82.
KEENAN, Edward L. and COMRIE, Bernard (1977): Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8 (1), 63-99.
KIERNAN, Thomas Joseph (1954). The Irish Exiles in Australia. Clonmore and Reynolds.
KIESLING, Scott (1998). Variation and Men’s Identity in a Fraternity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2 (1), 69-100.
KIESLING, Scott (2004). English Input to Australia. In Raymond Hickey (Ed.), Legacies of Colonial English. Studies in Transported Dialects. (pp. 418-439). Cambridge University Press.
LOWTH, Robert (1763). A Short Introduction to English Grammar: With Critical Notes. 2nd ed. A. Millar.
MEREDITH, Louisa (1973). Notes and Sketches of New South Wales. Penguin.
MUGGLESTONE, Lynda (1995). Talking Proper: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. Oxford University Press.
MURRAY, Lindley. (1798). English Grammar Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners: With an Appendix Containing Rules and Observations for Assisting the More Advanced Students to Write with Perspicuity and Accuracy. 4th ed. Collins and Perkins.
NEVALAINEN, Terttu and TANSKANEN, Sanna-Kaisa (2007). (Eds.). Letter Writing. Originally published as a special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5.2 (2004). John Benjamins.
O’BRIEN, John and PAURIC, Travers (1991). (Eds.). The Irish Emigrant Experience in Australia. Poolbeg.
O´FARRELL, Patrick (1984). Letters from Irish Australia 1825-1929. New South Wales University Press.
O’FARRELL, Patrick (1986). The Irish in Australia. New South Wales University Press.
PRICE, Charles (1987). Immigration and ethnic origin. In Wray Vamplew (Ed.), Australians: Historical Statistics. (pp. 2-22). Syme and Weldon Associates.
PRIESTLEY, Joseph (1772). The Rudiments of English Grammar: Adapted to the Use of Schools; with Notes and Observations. For the Use of Those Who Have Made Some Proficiency in the Language. John and Francis Rivington.
QUIRK, Randolph (1957). Relative Clauses in Educated Spoken English. English Studies 38, 97-109.
QUIRK, Randolph et al. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.
RISSANEN, Matti (1984). The Choice of Relative Pronouns in 17th century American English. In Jacek Fisiak (Ed.), Historical Syntax (pp. 417-435). Mouton de Gruyter.
RISSANEN, Matti (1999). Syntax. In Roger Lass (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. III. 1476-1776. (pp. 187-331). Cambridge University Press.
ROMAINE, Suzanne (1982). Socio-Historical Linguistics. Its Status and Methodology. Cambridge University Press.
SIGLEY, Robert (1997). The Influence of Formality and Channel on Relative Pronoun Choice in New Zealand English. English Language and Linguistics, 1 (2), 207-232.
SUÁREZ-GÓMEZ, Cristina (2008). Strategies in Competition: Demonstratives and Interrogatives as Relativizers in the History of English. English Studies 89, 339-350.
SUÁREZ-GÓMEZ, Cristina (2012). The Consolidation of þat as an Invariable Relativizer in the History of English. Nordic Journal of English Studies 11(1): 79-107.
TAGLIAMONTE, Sali (2002). Variation and Change in the British Relative Marker System. In Patricia Poussa (Ed.), Dialect Contact on the North Sea Littoral (pp. 147-165). Lincom Europa.
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL CORPUS. https://data.ldaca.edu.au/search (21 April, 2023)
TOTTIE, Gunnel (1997). Overseas Relatives: British-American Differences in Relative Marker Usage. In Jan Aarts and Herman Wekker (Eds.), Studies in English Language Research and Teaching (pp. 153-165). Rodopi.
TRUDGILL, Peter (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich City. Cambridge University Press.
TRUDGILL, Peter (2004). New-Dialect Formation. The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh University Press.
TURNER, George (1994). English in Australia. In Robert Burchfield (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 5: English in Britain and Overseas – Origins and Development (pp. 277-327). Cambridge University Press.
TWAIN, Mark (1973). Mark Twain in Australia and New Zealand. Penguin.
TWOPENY, Richard (1973). Town Life in Australia. Penguin.
VAN GELDEREN, Elly (2014). A History of the English Language. John Benjamins.
VAN HATTUM, Marije (2015). ‘Queensland for Ever and Augus un ballybug go braugh’: The Expression of Identity in Nineteenth-Century Irish Emigrant Letters. In David Evans (Ed.), Language and Identity. Discourse in the World (pp. 105-122). Bloomsbury.
VISSER, Frederikus Theodorus (1963-73). An Historical Syntax of the English Language. E.J. Brill.
YÁÑEZ-BOUZA, Nuria (2012). Grammar Writing and Provincial Grammar Printing in the Eighteenth-Century British Isles. Transactions of the Philological Society, 110, 34-46.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los trabajos publicados en esta revista son propiedad de sus respectivos autores y autoras, quienes conceden a la Revista de Filología de la Universidad de La Laguna el derecho de primera publicación, tal y como se recoge en nuestra Política de derechos de autoría.
