Investigación curricular comparativa crítica, más allá de la política neoliberal globalizada
Resumen
Problemas transnacionales, como el nacionalismo cultural, el populismo, el proteccionismo económico, la construcción de la identidad en las redes sociales, el comportamiento performa- tivo, el fundamentalismo religioso, la desconfianza en la participación política democrática y una disminución del respeto por las instituciones generadoras de conocimiento los medios de comunicación tradicionales, han puesto en tela de juicio las ideas tradicionales de ciuda- danía y de formación de la identidad en las sociedades democráticas en los últimos 30 años. El auge de los nuevos medios de comunicación social y la ideología neoliberal dominante en los estados capitalistas han contribuido a estas tendencias. La Teoría de la Educación No Afirmativa (NAT) permite abordar estos retos ofreciendo un marco reflexivo desde el que analizar los objetivos, los contenidos, los métodos y la gobernanza de la educación, y puede servir como punto de partida para la investigación curricular comparada.
Descargas
Citas
Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benner, D. (2015). Allgemeine Pädagogik (8. edition). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Brincat, S. (2009). “Hegel’s gesture to radical cosmopolitanism.” Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies, 1, 47-65.
Burgess, D., & Newton, P. (Eds.). (2015). Educational administration and leadership. Theoretical foundations. New York: Routledge.
Day, C. (2005). “Sustaining success in challenging contexts: Leadership in English schools.” Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230510625674.
Deng, Z. (2016). “Bringing curriculum theory and didactics together - A Deweyan perspective.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 75-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1083465.
Elo, J. & Uljens, M. (2022). “Theorising pedagogical dimensions of higher education leadership–a non-affirmative approach.” Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00890-0.
Fang He, M., Schultz, B., & Schubert, W. (2015). The SAGE Guide to Curriculum in Education. Los Angeles: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346687.
Friesen, N., & Sævi, T. (2010). “Reviving forgotten connections in North American teacher edu- cation. Klaus Mollenhauer and the pedagogical relation.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 142(1), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903494279.
Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Corwin Press.
Gervais, J. (2016). “The operational definition of competency-based education.” The Journal of Com- petency-Based Education, 1(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1011.
Green, B. (2017). Curriculum, Politics and the Postmodern; or, Beyond the Knowledge Question in Curriculum Inquiry. Currículo sem Fronteiras 17(3), pp. 501-514, under the title “Currículo, Política E A Pósmodernidade: além da questão do conhecimento na pesquisa em currículo.”
Grek, S. (2008). “From symbols to numbers: the shifting technologies of education governance in Europe.” European Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 2018-2218. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2008.7.2.208.
Gunter, H.M., Grimaldi, E., Hall, D., & Serpieri, R. (2016). New public management and the reform of education: European lessons for policy and practice. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735245.
Gunter, H. & Ribbins, P. (2003). “Challenging orthodoxy in school leadership studies: knowers, knowing and knowledge?” School Leadership & Management 23(2), 129-147.
Hopmann, S.T. (1999). “The Curriculum as a Standard of Public Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18, 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005139405296.
Hopmann, S. (2015). “Didaktik meets Curriculum’ revisited. Historical encounters, systematic experience, empirical limits.” Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015:1, DOI: 10.3402/nstep.v1.27007.
Hveem, H. (1999) “Political Regionalism: Master or Servant of Economic Internationalization?” In B. Hettne, A. Inotai, & O. Sunkel (Eds), Globalism and the New Regionalism (pp. 85-115). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27268-6_4.
Jank, W., & Meyer, H. (1997). Didaktikens centrala frågor. In Uljens, M. (Ed.), Didaktik – teori, reflektion, praktik (pp. 47-76). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Karseth, B., & Sivesind, K. (2010). “Conceptualising curriculum knowledge within and beyond national context.” European Journal of Education, 45(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01418.x.
Kant, I. (1915). Avhandlingar om fred och rätt. Stockholm: Albert Bonnier.
Kemp, P. (2010). Citizen of the world: The cosmopolitan ideal for the twenty-first century. New York: Humanity Books.
Klafki, W. (1995). On the problem of teaching and learning contents from the standpoint of critical-constructive Didaktik. In S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum (pp. 187-200). Kiel: IPN.
Moland, L.L. (2011). Hegel on political identity. Patriotism, nationality, cosmopolitanism. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Moos, L. (2017). Neo-liberal governance leads education and educational leadership astray. In M. Uljens & R. Ylimaki (Eds.), Bridging Educational Leadership, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik - Non-Affirmative Theory of Education (pp. 151-180). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58650-2_2.
Moos, L., & Wubbels, T. (2018). “General education: Homogenised education for the globalized world?” Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-018-0809-z.
Møller, J. (2017). “Leading education beyond what works.” European Educational Research Jour- nal, 16(4), 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117705487.
Niesche, R. (2017). “Critical perspectives in educational leadership: a new ‘theory turn’?” Journal of Educational Administration and History, 50(3), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2017.1395600.
Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (Eds.). (2014). Transnational policy-flows in European education: The making and governing of knowledge in the education policy field. Oxford: Symposium.
Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2018). “Exploring curriculum change using discursive institutionalism – a conceptual framework.” Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482961.
Normand, R. (2016). The changing epistemic governance of European education. The fabrication of the Homo Academicus Europeanus? Cham: Springer.
Normand, R., & Derouet, J.-L. (2017). A European politics of education. Perspectives from sociology, policy studies and politics. London: Routledge.
Oettingen, von. A. (2016). Almen didaktik. Köpenhamn: Munksgaard.
Paraskeva, J.M., & Steinberg, S. (eds.). (2016). Curriculum: Decanonizing the field. New York: Peter Lang.
Perander, J.J.F. (1883). Herbartianismen i pedagogiken. Helsingfors: J.C. Frenckell & Son. Peters, M.A., Paraskeva,
J.M., & Besley, T. (eds.). (2015). The global financial crisis and educa- tional restructuring. New York: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1492-2. Petersen, O.H. & Hjelmar, U. (2014). “Marketization of welfare services in Scandinavia: A review of Swedish and Danish experiences.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 17(4), 3-20.
Pettersson, D., Popkewitz, T.S., & Lindblad, S. (2017). “In the grey zone: large-scale assess- ment-based activities betwixt and between policy, research and practice.” Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1316181.
Pinar, W.F. (2011). The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, currere, and the recurring question of the subject. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015839.
Priestley, M. (2011). “Whatever happened to curriculum theory? Critical realism and curriculum change.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.582258.
Schmidt, V.A. (2008). “Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303-326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. polisci.11.060606.135342.
Shields, C. M. (2012). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable change in a uncertain and complex world. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814406.
Sivesind, K., & Wahlström, N. (2017). “Curriculum and leadership in transnational reform: A discursive-institutionalist approach.” In M. Uljens & R. Ylimaki (Eds.), Bridging Educa- tional Leadership, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik - Non-Affirmative Theory of Education (pp. 439-464). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58650-2_14.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Tian, M., & Risku, M. (2018). “A distributed leadership perspective on the Finnish curriculum reform 2014.” Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1499806.
Tiihonen, S. (2004). From Governing to Governance. A process of change. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Uljens, M. (1997). School didactcs and learning. Hove: Psychology Press.
Uljens, M. (2015). “Curriculum work as educational leadership: Paradoxes and theoretical founda- tions.” Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27010.
Uljens, M. (2016). “Non-Affirmative Curriculum Theory in a Cosmopolitan Era?” Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, Sergipe, Brasil, (Time and Space in Education), 9(18), 121-132. https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/4970.
Uljens, M. (in press). Non-affirmative school didactics. In M. Uljens (Ed.), Non-affirmative theory of Education and Bildung. Springer.
Uljens, M., & Nyman, C. (2013). “Educational Leadership in Finland or Building a Nation with Bildung.” In L. Moos. (Ed.), Transnational Influences on Values and Practices in Nordic Educational Leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (pp. 31-48). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6226-8_3.
Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. (2017). “Non-Affirmative Theory of Education as a Foundation for Curriculum Studies, Didaktik and Educational Leadership.” In M. Uljens & R. Ylimaki (Eds.), Bridging Educational Leadership, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik - Non-Affirmative Theory of Education (pp. 3-145). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58650-2_1.
Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2018). “Discursive institutionalism: towards a framework for analysing the relation between policy and curriculum.” Journal of Education Policy, 33(1), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1344879.
Wraga, W.G. (2016). “Arresting the decline of integrity in curriculum studies in the United States: The policy of opportunity.” In J.M. Paraskeva & S. Steinberg (Eds.), Curriculum: Decan- onizing the field (pp. 99-110). New York: Peter Lang.
Young, M. (2013). “Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory - A knowledge-based approach”, Jour- nal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.764505.
