University Library

[vc_row][vc_column width=»2/3″][vc_column_text]

Self-assessment questions

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Preguntas para autoevaluar un artículo científico antes de enviarlo a un editor:

  • Does the title reflect the content?
  • Are the theoretical review and conceptual framework developed with a sufficient level of detail?
  • Have the most relevant background details been cited?
  • Are the objectives of the work explicitly stated? Is the methodology followed adequately described?
  • Have all methodological changes and deviations from usual approaches been cited?
  • Are diagrams of the complex experimental setups included?
  • Are tables and figures really necessary?
  • Do the tables and figures follow the format required by the journal?
  • Are the weaknesses in our data and results discussed?
  • Are the conclusions clear?
  • Are the conclusions derived from the theoretical approach, the results obtained, and the methodology used?
  • Are the conclusions related to the objectives?
  • Are there contradictions between our conclusions and previous findings?
  • Are you considering new prospects for future work?
  • Are all the references cited in the text included?
  • Is the reference format the one required by the journal?
  • Are all acknowledgments to institutions, people, and entities that have collaborated directly or indirectly on our article included?
  • Are the research projects that made the work possible cited?
  • Are there any vague points or sections that require further clarification?
  • Are there any unnecessary repetitions?
  • Are there any stereotypical expressions or unnecessary and rhetorical clichés?
  • Can complex sentences be broken down into simpler ones?
  • Is it possible to shorten the article's content?

Texto de CAMPANARIO, Juan Miguel.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=»1/3″][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]