The ekphrasis as rhetorical-discursive genre in C. Claudianus’ Gigantomachia

  • Alexis Emanuel Robledo UBA-CONICET
  • Liliana Victoria Pégolo, ernestoycamilo UBA
Keywords: Late Antique, ekphrastic genre, enargeia, epic

Abstract

Claudius Claudianus —probably from Alexandria— settled in Milan towards the end of 395 AD at the imperial court of Honorius, seeking to develop his poetic skills. Among the authors of the Roman literary canon who enjoy linguistic biculturalism, Claudian is one of the few to have verses in both Latin and Greek. The Gigantomachia, written in both languages, exposes the contextual characteristics of production, since it exhibits rhetorical techniques typical of the Second Sophistic. During the expansion of this cultural phenomenon, the use of different stylistic devices such as ekphrasis, which can be seen in the panegyric epic of the Egyptian poet, intensified. In view of the above, this paper will focus on the analysis of ekphrasis in the Latin Gigantomachia, not as a mere ornament but as a rhetorical figure that structures the different moments of the story, contributing emotionally to the vivid representation of the images according to the principles of epictic rhetoric. The importance of the ekphrasis in the evolution of the late epic allows us to conceive of it as a genre in which the poetic voice suspends the narrative in order to divert attention from the whole to the brilliance of its parts, interweaving the different scenes of war through a variety of ekphrasis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARTSCH, S. - ELSNER, J. (2007): «Introduction: Eight Ways of Looking at an Ekphrasis», Classical Philology 102 (1): i-vi, Special Issues on Ekphrasis.

CAMERON, A. (1970): Claudian. Poetry and Propaganda at the Court of Honorius, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

CAMERON, A. (2011): The Last Pagans of Rome, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

CASON, F. (2017-2018): Claudiano, Gigantomachis (c.m. 53). Introduzione e commento, Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia.

CASTALDO, D. (2013): «De flores despojando el verde llano». Claudiano nella poesía barocca, da Faría a Góngora, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli.

CASTILLO BEJARANO, M. (1993): Claudiano. Poemas I-II, Gredos, Madrid.

CHARLET, J.-L. (2018): «Rivaliser avec Ovide (presque) sans Ovide: à propos de Claudien, Gigantomachie (carm. min. 53), vv. 91-113», en F. E. CONSOLINO (ed.), Ovid in Late Antiquity, Brepols, Tournhout, pp. 165-178.

CHRISTIANSEN, P. (1997): «Claudian: A Greek or a Latin?», Scholia 6: 79-95.

COOMBE, C. (2018): Claudian the poet, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

DELLA CORTE, F. (1971): La Gigantomachia di Ovidio, in Studi filologie storici in onore diVittorio de Falco, Istituto di filologia classica e medioevale, Napoli.

GELL, A. (1998): Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

GLARE, P. G. W. (ed.) (1968): Oxford Latin Dictionary, Oxford Clarendon Press, Oxford.

GRIMAL, P. (1984): Diccionario de mitología griega y romana, Editorial Paidós, Barcelona.

HALL, J. B. (ed.) (1985): Claudii Claudiani Carmina, De Gruyter, Stuttgart.

HARDIE, Ph. (1986): Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

HARDIE, Ph. (2019): Classicism and Christianity in Late Antique Latin Poetry, University of California Press, Oakland.

HINDS, S. (2013): «Claudianism in the De Raptu Proserpinae», en T. PAPANGHELIS - S. HARRISON - S. FRANGOULIDIS (eds.), Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature. Encounters, Interactions and Transformations, De Gruyter, Germany, pp. 169-192.

LIVREA, E. (1998): «La chiusa della Gigantomachia greca e la datazione del poemetto», Studi italiani di Filologia Classica 91: 194-201.

LOWE, D. (2018): Monsters and Monstrosity in Augestan Poetry, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

MULLIGAN, B. (2007): «The Poet From Egypt? Reconsidering Claudian’s Eastern Origin», Philologus 151: 285-310.

NEWLANDS, C. (2004). Statius’ Silvae and the Poetics of Empire, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

NEWLANDS, C. (2013):«Architectural Ecphrasis in Roman Poetry», en T. PAPANGHELIS - S. HARRISON - S. FRANGOULIDIS (eds.), Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature. Encounters, Interactions and Transformations, De Gruyter, Germany, pp. 55-78.

PLETT, H. (2012): Enargeia in Classical Antiquity and the Early Modern Age. The Aesthetics of Evidence, Brill, Leiden - Boston.

ROBERTS, M. (1989): The Jeweled Style. Poetry and Poetics in Late Antiquity, Cornell University Press, New York.

WARE, C. (2012): Claudian and the Roman Epic Tradition, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

WEBB, R. (1999): «Ekphrasis Ancient and Modern:The Invention of a Genre», Word and Image 15: 7-18.

WEBB,R.(2009): Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient RhetoricalTheory and Practice, Ashgate, Surrey.

ZAMORA, M. J. (1993): «La “Gigantomaquia” griega de Claudiano. Manuscritos, transmisión textual, atribución de autor y fecha de composición», Cuadernos de Filología Clásica 3: 347-375.

Published
2023-06-13
How to Cite
Robledo, Alexis, and Liliana Pégolo. 2023. “The Ekphrasis As Rhetorical-Discursive Genre in C. Claudianus’ Gigantomachia”. Fortunatae, no. 37 (June), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.fortunat.2023.37.04.
Section
Artículos